Your automation works until it doesn't. We make it reliable.
If you already have a Make or n8n workflow that is fragile, unfinished, duplicating work, silently failing, or corrupting good data, SIL can audit the existing system before anyone rebuilds it.
One bounded workflow reliability audit. We work from a workflow blueprint/export, schema, and redacted or synthetic fixtures where practical.
You get:- a concise failure-mode and root-cause map;
- explicit acceptance tests for the failures that matter;
- checks for retries, duplicate/idempotency behavior, silent failure paths, and unsafe data updates;
- a prioritized repair plan;
- one bounded staging repair or hardened sample when the scope is clear enough.
If the audit shows a clean bounded implementation path, we can scope that separately. If the workflow is already correct, we will say so.
We do not need your production passwords to start.
The first review is designed around exports, schemas, test accounts, and redacted/synthetic examples. Do not send production passwords, API secrets, unredacted SSNs, bank statements, or other unnecessary sensitive data.
What we actually test
- duplicate deliveries and safe reruns;
- transient API failures and bounded retries;
- blank or lower-authority data overwriting good values;
- partial failures that leave systems inconsistent;
- error visibility, logging, alerting, and recovery;
- handoff clarity so somebody else can maintain the workflow.
Proof, not invented case studies
SIL's current reliability canary is synthetic and clearly labeled as such. It starts with a deliberately brittle webhook-to-CRM workflow, reproduces a transient failure and duplicate delivery, then verifies a repaired path with bounded retry, idempotent deduplication, a structured audit trail, and deterministic acceptance checks.
Observed canary result: PASS. This is technical proof of the method, not a claim of prior customer work.
Interested?
Tell SIL what the workflow is supposed to do, what is going wrong, and which failure is costing you the most. We will confirm the smallest useful scope before asking for any files or access.
Contact SIL